Tuesday 10 May 2016

BOFORS  TO AUGUSTA WESTLAND
 Lt-Gen Harwant Singh 
 
Not that corruption exists only in defence deals; it runs, across-the-board, in India. Only in the case of defence deals, it is made sensational. It gets all the more pronounced, when some very obvious malfeasance is at play. 

In the case of Bofors, the Army was made to redraw the order of preference and place Bofors instead of French gun at number 1 position. When the story of money changing hands surfaced, much effort at cover up was at play in the case of this gun. Both in the case of Bofors and now Augusta Westland , play of bribery in the purchase, surfaced in foreign lands and not in India. 
 
In India the movement of VVIPs by helicopters, is handled by the Indian Air Force. This Service is responsible for laying down the Qualitative and Technical requirements in the selection of a suitable machine and its subsequent operations and maintenance. Further user trials of equipment under consideration are carried out within the country, in differing terrain and climate conditions as obtaining in India. Indian Air Force is equally in the know of locations, within the country, where VVIPs need go by helicopter. Therefore no other agency is qualified and need float any additional requirements: technical or otherwise, for VVIP helicopters.

As a rule, single vendor situation is invariably avoided for obvious reasons. In the case of Augusta Westland and Bofors we engineered our way to a position of a single vendor. Since, the original requirement of a ceiling of 6000 meters for the helicopter, was not being met by Augusta Westland, this figure  was reduced to 4500 meters, to be in line with this helicopter's performance parameters. This was done by the PMO and NSA, though these two had no play in this field. Thus Augusta was brought into reckoning. Even this was not enough, so yet another and completely absurd requirement related to the cabin height of 1.8 meters as against the figure of 1.5 meters worked out by the IAF was brought in. This height was based on the plea that the NSG personnel are above 6 feet in height. It implied that these men have to stand around the VVIP during the flight! This cabin height requirement of 1.8 meters ensured that the field was cleared, leaving Augusta Westland as the sole contender.

The trials instead of being conducted in the country, were carried out in another country, where terrain and climate was not even remotely similar to that obtaining in India.  Because of diverse terrain and climate conditions obtaining in India, trials of equipment normally takes one to two years. In this case trials were completed and report finalized in a period of four months.           ( Jan to April ) Further it is alleged that trials were carried out on 'representative' equipment and not on the actual equipment. The actual equipment, ( AW 101 ) at that point of time was still under development.

Later some additional features in the helicopter were asked for. IAF required Traffic Collusion Avoidance System 
( TCAS ) and Enhanced Ground Proximity Warning System (EGPWS) installed in all the helicopters. Of all the people, SPG recommended inclusion of Medical Evacuation System (Medevac) for 8 helicopters. These additional last minute, inclusions were a God sent opportunity for Westland to jack up the price. While IAF, based on past experience, wanted only 8 helicopters, NSG insisted on requirement of 12. How NSG arrived at this figure of 12 is anybody's guess. In the past IAF had been meeting the requirement of VVIPs with 8 helicopters with utalisation level being only 29 percent.

In single vendor cases, Contract Negotiation Committee (CNC) is required to establish a benchmark of reasonableness of price prior to the opening of the commercial offer. Now if the price indicated by the supplier is within the estimated cost by the buyer, price negotiations are generally dispensed with. In this case the estimated cost was assessed to be Rs 973 crores and this was approved by the MoD in January 2006. However by September 2008 the estimated cost was jacked up to Rs 4877.5 crores, more than six times the earlier estimate. Though finally Augusta Westland quoted a price of Rs 3966 crores, which being well within the estimated cost worked out by us, the proposal was acceptable. Though later this figure was brought down                   Rs 3726.96.  Though the question remained as to who jacked up the estimated cost six times! 

Once the murky side of this deal came into public knowledge, Government of India cancelled the contract. In the meantime three helicopters had been delivered and certain amount paid to the company. It is only when criminal proceedings were initiated against the Finmechanica ( Augusta Westland is a division of Finmechanica) CEO, Mr Gieseppe Orsi and others that the case of bribery and involvement of Indian officials and politicians came into focus and Indian governments was prodded by the Italian investigation agencies that in 2013, the government handed over the case to the Central Bureau of Investigation and further payments stopped. Now the Italian Appelllate court has laid bare the details of bribe money paid to various people in India, to clinch the deal.  

We should not repeat the Bofor’s episode where all the guilty got away, including Defence Secretary Bhatnagar, whom CBI had charge sheeted. He was sent as lt-Governor thus placing him outside the reach of palsied arm of law. Even in the case of Augusta West land some likely culprits have been moved into constitutional positions. Be that it may this one opportunity to bring to book, each and every person guilty of corruption, should not be wasted. This is a great opportunity for the country to take firm step on the road to putting an end to corruption, which is eating into the vitals of the nation. Every one, without exception, involved in this murky deal should be hauled up and let this be the first firm step in the direction of rooting out all consuming malaise of corruption in the country.

1 comment:

  1. The Defence deal malfeasance when pointed out by the media, the projection given is as though the Armed Forces are responsible for those misappropriations. It is common knowledge that the entire process right from approval of the purchases till its induction of all military hardware, it is the bureaucrats who retain the authority sidelining the military personnel. When the corruption charges are levied, never these bureaucrat's names come out and the matter is generalised on political grounds. Both the ruling party and the opposition trade charges and using the vigilance wings, whole matter is settled soundlessly. The culprit bureaucrats get assured respite from their political bosses and both walk to their banks happily. The bad taste lingers on for ages in the name of Armed Forces.

    ReplyDelete